{
    "href": "/post/2009/05/14/green-shoots-maybe-not/",
    "relId": "2009/05/14/green-shoots-maybe-not",
    "title": "Green Shoots? Maybe not.",
    "author": "pmjones",
    "markup": "html",
    "tags": [
        {
            "href": "/tag/economics/",
            "relId": "economics",
            "title": "Economics",
            "author": null,
            "created": null,
            "updated": [],
            "markup": "markdown"
        }
    ],
    "created": "2009-05-14 05:00:14 UTC",
    "updated": [
        "2009-05-14 05:00:14 UTC"
    ],
    "html": "<blockquote>\n<p>The \"green shoots\" theory of economic recovery is starting to look a bit like the herbs in my back yard--the ones I forgot to tell Peter to water while I was in Omaha.  Retail sales fell again, despite confident proclamations that consumers had rethought their overreaction last fall.  And foreclosures hit another record, which was oddly described as a \"levelling off\" by a lot of papers.  The March numbers showed a big spike, because legislative and corporate moratoriums expired.  In that context, a 1% increase in April isn't a \"levelling off\"--it's extraordinarily worrying.</p>\n<p>I don't want to push the Great Depression analogy too far, but what's surprising when you go back to primary sources from 1930 is the optimism.  I don't mean to imply that everyone thinks things are just swell.  But while you know that they are facing the worst economic decade of the twentieth century, they don't.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p><em>via <a href=\"http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/05/green_shoot.php\">Green? Shoot. - Megan McArdle</a>.</em></p>\n"
}
