(This is a response to Matthew Weier O'Phinney. Full disclosure: MWOP is both my friend and respected peer. Also, like MWOP, I am a voting member of PHP-FIG, and was directly involved in the recent LoggerInterface discussion among that group.)
\nMatthew wrote:
\n\n\nMy primary problem with the idea of shared interfaces is that I feel there is always room for new thinking and ideas in any given problem space, and that this thinking should not be restricted by what already exists.
\n
By definition, truly new thinking is not generally restricted by what already exists. ;-) If lots of developers adopt new thinking on an old problem, I think it is completely within reason to deprecate an older PSR and write a new one that codifies the new approach.
\nEven so, I always thought a major point of PHP-FIG was to recognize which things we already do much the same way and codify PSRs around them. (I will admit I continue to be frustrated by the unwillingness of other members to do basic research and discovery of this kind.)
\nThus, when we consider functionality ...
\n... I think it can be very useful to reduce the differences and combine the commonalities into a shared interface.
\nIn the specific case of logging, as Matthew gives, I reviewed each member project's logging interface or base implementation:
\n\nTrue, I was examining them in reference to the string-interpolation portion of the proposed LoggerInterface. But I was struck overall by how similar they really were in terms of the basic notification methods. Differences were minor at best. For something like that, a shared interface sounds to me like an unqualified good.
\nMatthew also wrote:
\n\n\nSecondarily, I feel that it's okay for a given project to be selective about what capabilities it requires for its internal consumption and consistency, and should not limit itself to a standardized interface.
\n
I completely agree. There's nothing that says a development effort is required to adopt anything from PHP-FIG. If someone thinks their way is better, then by all means ignore any and/or all PSRs entirely.
\nTo sum up (and MWOP, please correct me if I'm not getting what you're saying):
\nOne is able to imagine reasons why having shared interfaces of the kind described above is in opposition to, or at best orthogonal to, better development practices and greater innovation across PHP land.
\nEven so, I assert that shared interfaces as described, while maybe preventing an imaginable ideal in theory, instead promote an actual good in practice.
\nThe actual good can never be as desirable as the imaginable future ideal, but it does have the benefit of being real and present.
\nUPDATE: MWOP informs me by private communication that I have missed his point. I await his next missive. Here's his response: http://mwop.net/blog/2012-12-20-on-shared-interfaces.html#comment-744905017