\n\nSome locavores may continue to believe that our globalized food supply chain is the result of colonial and corporate agri-business raiders who crushed small farmers, packers and retailers the world over simply because they could. But we contend that modern practices are but the latest in a long line of innovations, the ultimate goal of which has always been to increase the accessibility, quality, reliability and affordability of humanity\u00e2\u0080\u0099s food supply. And if we may be so blunt, how many activists still use locally manufactured electric typewriters and copper-wired rotary-dial phones to spread their message and set up \u00e2\u0080\u009cgrassroots\u00e2\u0080\u009d links between food consumers and producers? How many move around in horse-drawn tramways, Ford Model Ts or even old-fashioned roller skates with parallel wheels? How many would trust doctors, meteorologists and computer engineers clinging to 1940s technology? If nonlocal modern technologies are good enough to serve the locavores\u00e2\u0080\u0099 needs, why aren\u00e2\u0080\u0099t they also desirable for agricultural producers?
\n
via Why eating global is more sustainable than eating local | Full Comment | National Post.
\n" }